What’s the deal, Kodansha?

I’d been avoiding reviews of the new reprint of Ghost in the Shell from Kodansha.  I’ve heard the rumors, but I wanted to wait until I got my hands on it before I said anything.  Well, now I have it.

So, what was the point, Kodansha?

What’s the point of giving us a GitS that is nearly identical to the first edition released by Dark Horse so many moons ago?  Why is it flipped, and missing pages (which Dark Horse restored in later editions)?  I love the work Frederick Schodt and Toren Smith had done with GitS, but do you really think this is what the current market of manga readers expect from you?  This would be the fourth copy I own of the first GitS (well, 5th since I accidentally purchased 2 copies of your edition.)  Do you believe I bought this release because I just had to have GitS with a matte interior finish?

What’s your master plan, Kodansha?  Why was it necessary to take this license away from Dark Horse, if you’re not doing a different treatment of the book?  It couldn’t have been because you felt Dark Horse wasn’t promoting the property, because I haven’t seen any marketing efforts from you.  I can’t even find your URL in this book.

Why are you here, Kodansha?  Is it really all about cashing in on a couple of movies?  If that’s the case, you’re about nine months too early.  Are the only books you’ll be releasing those with forthcoming Hollywood adaptations?  Can we expect Sailor Moon to be released in Tokyopop’s two-page magazine spread format, when Joss Whedon finally decides to make that movie, starring Miley Cyrus, Hilary Duff, and every other teen starlet from Nick who hasn’t had a scandal?  Yes, I’m starting a rumor.

Seriously, WTF, Kodansha?

But thanks for Akira.  Man, I haven’t read this in a while.

+++

Coincidentally, ANN has a brief but insightful interview with Frederick Schodt about the state of the industry.

+++

According to Anime News Network, Japanese companies are set to take an even tougher stance on illicit online trading of content.  Composed of 23 companies and 31 organizations across the fields of entertainment and technology, the Content Overseas Distribution Association will combat online sharing of anime via software that will automatically search for unauthorized videos (and presumably music, books, and games in the future) on the net.  Threat of this program becoming sentient in a sea of information notwithstanding, any such anti-piracy effort must have legal weight behind it to succeed, which in turn requires cooperative governments and the ability to carry out lawsuits in a cost-effective (maybe even profitable?) manner.  This is why I’m skeptical of the overall effectiveness of focusing on mainland China first, where copyright laws are openly flaunted without repercussion, and legal relief is difficult to obtain without deft handling of oft-corrupt local government officials.  How does the old adage go… litigation begins at home?

+++

The latest Flipped column offers some recommendations on horror manga, while AnimeOnDVD lists a few more contemporary selections.  It’s really too bad that few manga of traditional Japanese ghost stories, drawn by practically anonymous freelancers, are known outside of Japan.  Those are the ones I’d really like to see…

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)
  1. Seriously!? The new version of Ghost in the Shell is matte, flipped and censored? Did they retranslate it with netspeak as well? Why is it that the Japanese companies can’t seem to market their own properties at all. Criminy.

    Reply

    1. Just to be clear, anyone who hasn’t read Ghost in the Shell *should* pick up this book. The original translation is still fantastic, the re-paneling done by Studio Proteus is flawless, and the one missing scene is really minor. The book is actually larger and thicker than the Dark Horse versions. The interior paper is perfectly fine, and some people probably prefer matte over glossy for manga.

      That said, I’m coming at this from the perspective of someone who owns previous editions of the book, and had very high hopes for Kodansha when their entry into the North American market was rumored. For me, this purchase was utterly pointless. Kodansha, in their own minds, is no doubt aiming this at the masses of new readers they hope the movie would generate. But I think they are misreading the market, particularly on the issue of flipping. The idea that people can’t get used to reading from right to left should be banished along with the myth that digital will never replace print because people hate reading on monitors. The young and the tech savvy – the very same audience for a movie like GitS – are much more adaptable than the fuddy-duddies realize.

      Reply

      1. Unfortunately, I only have the 1995 version and was hoping for an authentic unaltered version, and giving some cash to a new presence on the US scene was a plus. Maybe they’ll make the money back on Western comic book fans who hate lesbians, but I’m not sure.

        Ghost in the Shell seems to be the kind of series people would have already made up their mind on. It, Akira, and Urotsukidoji essentially defined what anime is/was for the early ’90s. Torpedo breasted stripper kills a lot of people and has incomprehensible philosophical debates in a sci-fi Japan. Anyone who doesn’t grok it already is going to be a hard sell, I’d imagine. A new property like Chi’s Sweet Home seems to be a gamble worth taking: it might actually sell beyond the otaku set. Not so sure with Ghost or Sailor Moon.

        Reply

      2. Hmm.. I forgot what version of GitS I have. I assume the restored. I’ll wait. On reading right to left, it is getting bad now reading web comics or my western comics. I keeping reading the panels right to left and wondering why they don’t make sense.

        Reply

  2. The GitS issue is reversed for me, I didn’t have a copy of GitS before, but I’m pretty happy with this 7×10. Akira though, I’ve replaced each volume of that a few times and I really wasn’t impressed enough with this new edition to replace my Dark Horse hardcover.

    Reply

  3. My Theory: Kodansha is using these two series as seed capital — yeah, sure, they’ve set up the company with $2 Million and all that from last year’s press release — but I think they’re banking on sales of multiple volumes of Akira and GitS (as noted, they haven’t really changed a thing from the [earliest] Dark Horse editions of these books, in effect getting the translation and formatting for *free*) to get things rolling. Past the cost of printing, and since they aren’t spending any money on marketing, a web site, conventions and other fan outreach, or even free review copies for bloggers to generate a little internet buzz — since they have few other costs it’s all money in the bank.

    They could be planning to use the profits to launch the *real* US publishing company later. Or it could be a cash grab. Or they are being Kodansha and keeping all options open, not committing to anything, until the economy and manga market improve.

    I just don’t know. And I think I might pop a blood vessel if I think about Kodansha and their plans too much

    Reply

    1. The complete lack of marketing irks me. Like I said, if they’re just hoping to ride the trickle of GitS movie news, I think they’re a tad early. The only people who care right now are those who know the book already.

      Man, I feel even worse for Dark Horse now. =(

      Reply

      1. Don’t feel too bad, they wouldn’t get that Mike Richardson foreword by shitting all over Dark Horse. In fact, do you know who handled the printing? I’d actually be surprised if it didn’t go through DH in some capacity.

        Reply

  4. I totally agree with everything you said about GITS. I only have one copy, the “pre-restored” version from Dark Horse, which I bought used. My whole issue with this and the Akira books is that they’re just too damned expensive. I don’t usually pay $20-30 for PAPERBACK

    Reply

    1. Hey now, there are other publishers releasing paperbacks at $20… ;)

      Had I never read GitS before, I would think the price point on this is quite fair. This edition is oversized, larger than Dark Horse’s release, and it’s hefty. It’s worth it, just like Berserk is worth $14. And in all honesty, despite my bitching, I’ll still get GitS 2 from Kodansha when it comes out. But I hope they make some changes…

      Reply

  5. I have both the DH original Graphic Novel, a few of the 1st ed pamphlet style comics (all of GITS 2 and 1.5 in pamphlet form), and a Japanese bilingual edition I bought before DH released the restored edition. I’ve been considering whether to purchase the DH 2nd edition for some time. I guess I should probably do so soon, before it becomes impossible to find.

    Reply

  6. HTTP/1.1 200 OK Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2010 17:52:41 GMT Server: Apache X-Pingback: http://www.icaruscomics.com/wp_web/xmlrpc.php Connection: close Transfer-Encoding: chunked Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 200 OK

    OK

    The server encountered an internal error or misconfiguration and was unable to complete your request.

    Please contact the server administrator, support@supportwebsite.com and inform them of the time the error occurred, and anything you might have done that may have caused the error.

    More information about this error may be available in the server error log.


    Apache/1.3.33 Server at www.icaruscomics.com Port 80