A Drifting Life being made into film? | Newspaper company to introduce own e-reader, distro service

According to this Singaporean news site, a black-and-white movie adaptation of Yoshihiro Tatsumi’s A Drifting Life is currently in the works.  Few details are given, and I can’t find any other confirmation at the moment, so take this with a grain of salt.

+++

According to Engadget, Hearst Corp, a major newspaper publisher, will be introducing a digital content distribution service called Skiff, which will be compatible across a number of devices, including its own e-ink-based device.  The service will supposedly provide better margins for publishers, and allow easy injection of advertising.  The as yet unnamed e-reader is said to have better graphical capabilities than the current crop of devices, which is a must for the often image-heavy, complex layouts of newspapers.

So a newspaper media giant is taking the reigns and saving itself.  Makes one wonder if the comics industry shouldn’t consider the same path…

Also of interest, some early shots of an actual nook in the wild.  As one of the early adopters who placed an order back in October, I will be among the first to get the nook on the 9th, at which time I will promptly try to break it with hi-res porn manga PDFs.  Expect immediate impressions.

+++

Anime3000 collects some tweets about Tokyopop’s interest in working with scanlation sites.  It doesn’t look like the program will get off the ground…

+++

Robot6 has a few updates on the LoEG situation in Kentucky, in which the self-appointed censor at the heart of the controversy has pretty much dropped any pretense of this being a “protect the children” issue by using words like “tax base.”

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)
  1. Correct me if I misread the bill of rights (as I so often do), but isn’t the first amendment in place SPECIFICALLY to protect authors and artists against Kentucky’s “tax base” in the first place?

    Better get Lolita shelved in the “Definitely Going To Hell” section.

    Reply

    1. Not misreading, but you are technically misapplying it. A library refusing to shelf LoEG is not an infringement of free speech, no more than the same library refusing to shelf our line of books. It’s a travesty, yes… but not an affront to the First Amendment.

      Reply

      1. What if it’s a public library? :D

        Haha. But yeah, I get what you’re saying. Though, in my mind the idea that some books are not fit for public consumption is a cry to restrict access to the those books. But then, the bitch got fired so good enough. YEAH!

        Reply

        1. Yup, even when it’s a public library.

          Although, I should note that a copy of Blue Eyes volume 1 does reside at the Library of Congress.

          Reply

          1. Haha, I imagine that will be on your headstone.

            “Here Lies Simon Jones. Beloved husband and pornographer.

            A Copy of Blue Eyes Volume 1 Resides at the Library of Congress.”

  2. Well, last I read of the library situation, she wasn’t getting the support she wanted from local clergy, so now she thinks she can jump tracks to come at it from a financial angle.

    I also find it a little funny that these articles keep pushing the fact that she’s racking up 10 cents a day in late fees, but don’t really mention how much she’s costing the library through hearings, meetings and catalogue updates. I guarantee the re-shelving of 500-600 books costs the ‘tax base’ a lot more money than she owes to that same ‘tax base.’

    Reply

    1. I think some politico has latched onto this as a good family values issue, and been feeding her the kool-aid. Glad to hear the local clergy had enough sense not to touch this one.

      Reply

      1. Yeah, I can’t remember the quote, but there was that preacher that said comics are a little more in your face with their contents and he said there’d be a lot of bad reaction if someone illustrated the bible (heheh, funny that..)

        It wasn’t exactly a supportive statement, but it was neutral and had that underlying acknowledgment that religious texts could be the next books to come under fire.

        Reply