Not many news items, but they are all rather important in one way or another…
+++
Did Diamond Book Distributors just get “Macmillan-ed” by Amazon? It appears books represented by DBD are currently not available directly from the largest online retailer of books. Downtime to fix the glitch, or a sign of tension between the two? We are already familiar with Amazon’s penchant for being heavy-handed with publishers and distributors with whom it is in dispute, and the book listings do look quite a bit like Macmillan’s did a few weeks back. Publishers Weekly is leaning towards the latter explanation, and writes that the “resolution” may amount to liabilities upward of “hundreds of thousands of dollars.”
Tech Crunch reports some people have received $25 gift vouchers from Amazon. The story has also landed on The Consumerist, which is a bad place for a business to be 9 times out of 10.
+++
Over at Welcome Datacomp, famed designer and mangaka Yoshitoshi ABe shares his thoughts on newly proposed legislation that seeks to ban all sexually suggestive depictions of anyone under 18 from anime and manga. He notes that even Japanese family staples Doraemon and Sazae-san would run afoul of such a law.
+++
Anime, live-action film, and manga publisher Media Blasters confirmed with Anime News Network that it reduced staff by approximately 25%. The circumstances of the decision seem to be temporary, so hopefully the situation changes for the better as we get further into the year.
-
I was wondering what would happen at Amazon after that snafu. I had also wondered why Amazon suddenly stopped selling Berserk comics. I thought they might be out of stock again, but this makes much more sense.
-
“Did Diamond Book Distributors just get “Macmillan-ed” by Amazon? It appears books represented by DBD are currently not available directly from the largest online retailer of books. Downtime to fix the glitch, or a sign of tension between the two? We are already familiar with Amazon’s penchant for being heavy-handed with publishers and distributors with whom it is in dispute, and the book listings do look quite a bit like Macmillan’s did a few weeks back. ”
I realize, delicately put, that (somewhat) taking Amazon’s side in pro-Publisher waters is akin to building yourself a 100% Black angus steak-suite and jumping into the lions’ dens, but……..
…If Amazon did temporarily stop sales of Diamond books over the dispute, is that a crime against humanity (such as where authors placed the Macmillian ‘We’ll play hardball and you just take it!’ issue somewhere between the Cambodian killing fields and the Ukrainian forced-famine)? Amazon’s got a pretty costly hoedown on it’s hands via the Comic Conflagration of 10′, just looking at single-affiliate sell-through’s (http://www.bleedingcool.com/2010/03/08/amazon-stats-what-bleeding-cool-readers-ordered-so-far/) shows huge order numbers. Factor in all the customer service man-hours/PR help that this issue is going to consume, this can conceivably be a problem that costs over a million dollars.
Especially if the problem originated with Diamond, you can be sure that Amazon is going to want them to pony up some duckets in this wing-ding. And if Diamond is resistant, what tools does a middle-man posses to bring pressure on a supplier other than to stop selling their goods? Should Amazon plaster a big corn-shuckin’ grin on it’s face while it swallows a potentially million+ problem gracefully laid by one if it’s suppliers, whilst still happily making said supplier money?
Amazon, in my usually not-so-humble opinion, has repeatedly shown want of good PR strategy/execution. However, in fairness, Amazon is also not some magically appearing force of nature, like Lorna Doone rising from the mist, that just happens to be tended to by Jeff Bezos. It is not a public utility run for the sake of book publishers. Amazon is a business, who in many cases drives a substantial part of the very revenue that authors/publishers are attacking it over. Middle-men do not control product content/manufacturing/etc., in a dispute a middle-man’s only weapon is often only to stop selling the product(s) in question.
I don’t think enough of the good ol’ fashioned, chicken-fried info/facts are out there yet to say if Amazon’s move in this case is heavy-handed or not.















4 comments
Comments feed for this article
Trackback link: http://www.icaruscomics.com/wp_web/wp-trackback.php?p=4435